David Munoz ↔ Dream Future (MCN) Dispute Report (Document-Based)

As-of date: 2026-02-13 (US time).
Scope: This report summarizes what is supported by the documents currently in this folder, plus clearly-labeled “reported facts” provided by David. It is not legal advice.

Live Q&A / Updates

This section is updated by David (Dante) without redeploying the site. Public visitors see only published items.

Loading…

Sources browser · Admin (requires key)

1) Executive summary (what we know so far)

Evidence grading used in this report (to keep things unambiguous)

Reported current situation (C unless otherwise noted)

What the documents do support strongly

Status dashboard (answers we now have vs still missing)

2) Documents used for this report (local folder)

3) Parties & key identifiers (from the contract)

Dream Future (Party A)

David / Jingo (Party B)

4) Timeline (documented + reported)

Contract timeline (documented)

Account-lockout timeline (documented/partially documented)

Account-lockout timeline (reported, not yet corroborated by the current evidence packet)

5) Contract terms that matter most to the dispute

5.1 Control/use of accounts during the contract

Practical impact: a “you can’t log in / you are blocked from using the accounts” posture is difficult to reconcile with an explicit “equal rights to use” clause, unless there is a later written agreement changing access or a valid termination. (Dream Future x David Munoz Final Contract-Stamped-Signed_clean_text.txt:728; Dream Future x David Munoz Final Contract-Stamped-Signed_clean_text.txt:665)

5.2 Ownership is clear only in limited scenarios (important for “return the accounts”)

Practical impact: “return the accounts” is still a strong remedy goal, but the docs suggest you should avoid framing the dispute as “account ownership is obviously mine right now” unless you have additional platform-side proof of registration/实名/绑定 and/or a termination/decision that resolves ownership. (pdf_text_dump.txt:304; see evidence needs needed_details.md:12)

5.3 Notice & termination mechanics (why “termination already happened” is not proven yet)

Practical impact: based on documents alone, treat “contract terminated” as uncertain/disputed until a compliant written notice (or court decision/settlement) is located. (Dream Future x David Munoz Final Contract-Stamped-Signed_clean_text.txt:665)

5.4 Payment / revenue sharing (relevant to unpaid money claims)

Practical impact: David’s unpaid-shares claims should be organized around: (a) the underlying business order agreements, (b) when Party A received settlement, (c) the applicable split, and (d) proof of non-payment. (needed_details.md:36; Dream Future x David Munoz Final Contract-Stamped-Signed_clean_text.txt:171)

5.5 Venue / governing law

6) Evidence review: what the current packet contains

6.1 Lawyer proposal / memo (Shanghai Zhong Xia Law Firm)

This memo (to Dante) summarizes the dispute and proposes two legal postures:

6.2 Chat exports (what they support)

Account control / SIM / device:

“We took them back” posture:

Money references (not a complete accounting):

Security warning: the group chat export includes plaintext login credentials. Do not share that raw file with third parties without redaction; rotate/secure all credentials ASAP. (Entire DF x Dante Group Chat History.txt:4615)

7) Dispute posture & “current state” (what’s provable vs what needs more)

7.1 What’s most provable right now

7.2 What needs more proof/evidence (high priority gaps)

8) Goals (David’s priorities)

From David’s reported priorities (not yet supported by a complete evidence packet), the desired outcomes are:

  1. Recover the disputed accounts (Douyin/WeChat Channels/Xiaohongshu) and restore control/access. (david_notes.md:18)
  2. Unbind Bilibili from MCN binding (while David retains control of Bilibili login). (david_notes.md:18)
  3. Recover unpaid money (shares/reimbursements). (david_notes.md:20)
  4. Remove defamatory content and ideally obtain public correction/apology/admission. (david_notes.md:18; pdf_text_dump.txt:322)

9) Strategy options (high-level; choose based on evidence + budget)

Option A — “Continue performance / cure breach” (often fastest for account access)

Use the contract-in-force posture and demand:

Why this can be effective:

Option B — “Terminate for breach” + damages/ownership arguments (escalation)

If evidence supports that Dream Future’s conduct “makes it impossible to achieve the purpose of the contract”, counsel memo suggests PRC Civil Code Art. 563 as a basis to terminate and pursue unpaid shares and related liabilities. (pdf_text_dump.txt:350)

Risk:

Option C — Platform-first + “file to show movement toward litigation”

A third-party lawyer idea (from notes) is to file initial court documentation and give the platform proof of filing/acceptance to see if it triggers account return, step-by-step (起诉状 → 受理通知书 → platform). (david_notes.md:3)

Risk:

10) Evidence packet: what David should compile next (clean list)

This is the “minimum viable packet” before deep analysis or filing:

11) Money claim substantiation plan (turn “~$3,500” into evidence)

Until there is paper-trail support, treat the $3,500 as an allegation. (david_notes.md:20)

Recommended structure:

  1. Build a spreadsheet: one row per collaboration/order (Liangzhu, Banu, Canton Fair, etc.).
  2. For each row, attach: contract/order, deliverables, invoicing, settlement statement, proof of Party A receipt of funds, expected split per contract, amount paid, amount unpaid.
  3. Keep currencies separate (USD vs RMB) and avoid conflating “3,500 yuan incentive fund” with “$3,500 USD”. (Entire DF x Dante Group Chat History.txt:7038; david_notes.md:82)

Contract clauses that matter to payments:

12) Defamation / reputation-harm claim support

The counsel memo suggests pursuing civil remedies for reputational harm if the posted content damaged David’s reputation. (pdf_text_dump.txt:322)

Evidence best practices (from checklist):

13) Attorney options reflected in the documents (and cost reality)

13.1 Shanghai Zhong Xia Law Firm (proposal document)

13.2 Sichuan Faxian Law Firm (agency contract + POA templates)

13.3 “100,000 RMB total / 20,000 upfront + 30% income until paid” plan (notes only)

13.4 “Most economical” framing (given the documents)

14) Immediate next steps (actionable)

14.1 Security / account hygiene

14.2 Evidence preservation (do before negotiation escalates)

14.3 Build the “case packet”

14.4 Decide on posture: restore access vs terminate

15) Open questions (answering these will reduce legal cost)

Appendix A) Quick evidence pointers (high-signal lines)